Legal Opinion
Thomas v. Kirkpatrick
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided August 25, 2023No. 7:18-cv-00051-CS-JCMUnknown
1Opinion
adopted as the decision of the Court. The Petition is denied. Further, because reasonable jurists would not find it de that Petitioner has failed to make a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, a certificate of appeala not issue. See 28 U.S.C. 2253(c). The Clerk shall close the case. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SO ORDERED. SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK wily □□ 8/25/23 x TT CATITY S#IBEL, U.S.D.I. ENGLISH THOMAS, Petitioner, REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION -against- 18 Civ. 0051 (CS)JCM) MICHAEL KIRKPATRICK, Superintendent, Respondent. □□□ eX To the Honorable Cathy Seibel,…
2Cases cited60 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Woodford v. NgoSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.