Legal Opinion

Van Driessche v. Ohio-Esezeoboh

District Court, S.D. Texas

Decided December 12, 2006No. Misc. Action H-06-220PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

HITTNER, District Judge.

On August 25, 2006 and October 3, 2006, the Court conducted a non-jury trial on the above-referenced matter. The Court has reviewed the evidence, the post-trial sub missions of the parties, and the applicable law. The Court now enters the following findings- of fact and conclusions of law. Any finding of fact that should be construed as a conclusion of law is hereby adopted as such. Any conclusion of law that should be construed as a finding of fact is hereby adopted as such.

FINDINGS OF FACT

1. Petitioner Christian Van Driessche…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Emanuel Friedrich v. Jeana Michele Friedrich, David Harper and Shirley HarperCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
  2. In Re: The Application Of, Arnon Mozes v. Michal MozesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  3. Edward M. Feder v. Melissa Ann Evans-FederCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
  4. Whallon v. LynnCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
  5. Felix Blondin v. Marthe DuboisCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Guimaraes v. BrannCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2018
  2. Blanc v. MorganDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2010
  3. Bernal v. GonzalezDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2012
  4. Gallardo v. OrozcoDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2013
  5. Muhlenkamp v. BlizzardDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 2007

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API