Van Driessche v. Ohio-Esezeoboh
District Court, S.D. Texas
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
HITTNER, District Judge.
On August 25, 2006 and October 3, 2006, the Court conducted a non-jury trial on the above-referenced matter. The Court has reviewed the evidence, the post-trial sub missions of the parties, and the applicable law. The Court now enters the following findings- of fact and conclusions of law. Any finding of fact that should be construed as a conclusion of law is hereby adopted as such. Any conclusion of law that should be construed as a finding of fact is hereby adopted as such.
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. Petitioner Christian Van Driessche…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Emanuel Friedrich v. Jeana Michele Friedrich, David Harper and Shirley HarperCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
- In Re: The Application Of, Arnon Mozes v. Michal MozesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Edward M. Feder v. Melissa Ann Evans-FederCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Whallon v. LynnCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
- Felix Blondin v. Marthe DuboisCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Guimaraes v. BrannCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2018
- Blanc v. MorganDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2010
- Bernal v. GonzalezDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2012
- Gallardo v. OrozcoDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2013
- Muhlenkamp v. BlizzardDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 2007
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.