Legal Opinion
United States v. Clinton D. Andersen and Douglas M. Van Damme
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided January 18, 1995No. 94-1866, 94-1926PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CUDAHY, Circuit Judge.
I. FACTS
The defendants-appellants Van Damme and Andersen owned and operated a veterinary clinic, treating primarily food-producing animals, especially dairy cattle. During 1984-1986 they also ran a “side business” in veterinary drugs. They bought drugs in bulk, first from both legitimate commercial suppliers and from illegitimate private suppliers in the United States, and later from overseas. Some were raw ingredients, which the defendants mixed to form useful drug compounds, others they simply broke down into smaller dosage units and repackaged. The packaging used was…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. Marlene Cox Schneider and Paul S. SchneiderCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Kenneth E. HaddockCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Billy Lee ArlenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Joann MitcheltreeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Anthony Loscalzo, Andrew Loscalzo, Merry Stumpf, David H. Siegel, and Albert L. BoemoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- United States v. Robert RuheCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Frank AnticoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Jim Gee and William C. Norris, Defendants-Appellants/cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Vitek Supply Corporation and Jannes DoppenbergCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
- United States v. Michael CosciaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.