Legal Opinion
Safari Motor Coaches, Inc. v. Corwin
New York Supreme Court
Decided September 20, 1994PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*450OPINION OF THE COURT
William H. Keniry, J.
At issue in this CPLR article 75 proceeding is whether or not an arbitration award made in a proceeding initiated under General Business Law § 198-a, the Lemon Law, should be vacated on the ground that the arbitrator exceeded his powers.
Petitioner, Safari Motor Coaches, Inc., as defined in General Business Law § 198-a (n) (2), is a manufacturer of motor homes which are sold in New York. In June 1992 respondent W. Russell Corwin purchased a new motor home manufactured by Safari from an Amsterdam, New York dealership for $110,806 plus sales tax and fees.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- MOTOR VEHICLE MFRS. v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
- Jandreau v. La VigneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- General Motors Corp. v. LeeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- General Motors Corp. v. FischerNew York Supreme Court · 1988
- Breasett v. FordSuffolk County District Court · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In re the Arbitration between Safari Motor Coaches, Inc. & CorwinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Alfa Leisure, Inc. v. LaBombardNew York Supreme Court · 2007