Legal Opinion

Rusciano & Son Corp. v. Joseph Rustin's, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 7, 1994Published

1Opinion of the Court

—Action pursuant to CPLR 3222 upon an agreed statement of facts to hold the defendants liable for a pro rata share of the maintenance and carrying costs of a certain common parking area located in the subject industrial park.

Adjudged that the defendants are under no obligation to reimburse the plaintiffs for the maintenance or carrying costs of the common parking area, with costs to the defendants.

We held in 6-8 Pelham Parkway Corp. v Rusciano & Son Corp. (170 AD2d 497), that the zoning agreement entered into between the plaintiffs in this action and the Village of Pelham Manor in 1953, as…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ball v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. Ultramar Energy Ltd. v. Chase Manhattan BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  3. Erlitz v. Erlitz v. Segal, Liling & ErlitzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  4. Stone v. Solarbrite, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  5. 6-8 Pelham Parkway Corp. v. Rusciano & Son Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API