Legal Opinion
6-8 Pelham Parkway Corp. v. Rusciano & Son Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 11, 1991PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action for a judgment declaring that the plaintiff has the right to make use of a certain parking area, the defendants Rusciano & Son Corp., Secor Lane Corp. and P.V.E. Co. appeal from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Reilly, J.H.O.), entered January 24, 1989, as, after a nonjury trial, held that a certain agreement entered into between the appellants and defendant-respondent Village of Pelham Manor constituted a zoning agreement pursuant to which the plaintiff has the right to use the off-street parking area in question.
Ordered that the judgment is…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Burns Jackson Miller Summit & Spitzer v. LindnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Fourth Ocean Putnam Corp. v. Interstate Wrecking Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Lake Placid Club Attached Lodges v. Elizabethtown Builders, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Nepco Forged Products, Inc. v. Consolidated Edison Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Canick v. CanickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Cornerstone Metrofit Corp. v. Rusciano & Son Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Rusciano & Son Corp. v. Joseph Rustin's, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994