Legal Opinion

Barber-Greene Co. v. Gould

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 30, 1926No. 6 Div. 333PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSomerville, J.

The chief matter of controversy is the right of the plaintiff to have commissions on the sales of four machines called “loaders,” one to J. A. Burt and three to the Crittenden-Ozark Joint Project. These machines were sold through plaintiff’s subagents, the Brandéis Machinery & Supply Company, of Louisville, Ky., and the shipments were made to the respective purchasers in Arkansas. When the orders were accepted and the machines shipped, defendant credited plaintiff with commissions of $933.32 —$233.33 on each machine.

Claiming that the machines were defective and not adapted for the work for…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Restein v. McCadden & Bro.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
  2. Stone v. ArgersingerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
  3. Garnhart v. RentchlerIllinois Supreme Court · 1874
  4. Paul E. Wolff Shirt Co. v. SacksMissouri Court of Appeals · 1914
  5. Taylor Manufacturing Co. v. KeySupreme Court of Alabama · 1888

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Anderson Ford, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1996
  2. Ar-Con Building Specialties, Inc. v. Famco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
  3. Aerosonic Corp. v. Diversified Construction Components, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969
  4. Johnson v. Anderson Ford, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API