Legal Opinion

Garnhart v. Rentchler

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1874PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of St. Clair county; the Hon. William H. Snyder, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scholfield

By the terms of the contract between appellant and appellees, he was to pay them for selling his machines, 20 per cent on cash sales, and 12 per cent on time sales. They were, among other things, required to set up and start all machines when sold, and remedy every complaint within their power; and they also agreed not to hold the appellant liable for damages in the event that he was not able to fill their orders. Each machine was to pay its own commission—that is, the commission for the sale of each machine was to be deducted and retained by appellees from the proceeds of such sales.…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Greene v. HollingsheadAppellate Court of Illinois · 1891
  2. Hackney Mfg. Co. v. CelumTexas Commission of Appeals · 1920
  3. Hall v. French-American Wine Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912
  4. Barber-Greene Co. v. GouldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API