Legal Opinion

Martin v. Amana Refrigeration, Inc.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided January 25, 1989No. 87-851PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHULTZ, Justice.

Plaintiff Connie Martin purchased a combination gas furnace and water heater manufactured by Amana Refrigeration, Inc. (Amana). Plaintiff has filed suit against Amana, alleging breach of implied warranty in the design and construction of the furnace and water heater. 1 She asserts that the water heater as a whole is defective and that the furnace has inherent flaws, allowing flames to escape. Among her damages is the claim that defendant should provide for the removal of the entire system from her home.

Plaintiff also requested her suit be certified as a class action on behalf…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Amato v. General Motors Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1981
  3. In Re the Cadillac V8-6-4 Class ActionSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2004
  4. Vignaroli v. Blue Cross of IowaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1985
  5. Mitchem v. MeltonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1981

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Microsoft Corp. v. Manning, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1995
  2. Vos v. Farm Bureau Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2003
  3. Comes v. Microsoft Corp.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2005
  4. Luttenegger v. Conseco Financial Servicing Corp.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2003
  5. City of Dubuque v. Iowa TrustSupreme Court of Iowa · 1994

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API