Legal Opinion

Alexander v. Inman

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided June 22, 1998No. 01S01-9705-CH-00103PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BIRCH, Justice.

We granted permission to appeal under Tenn. R.App. P. 11 to the appellant, Julia Ann White Inman, in order to determine the amount of attorneys’ fees, if any, that the appellees, attorneys David A. Alexander 1 and Maclin P. Davis, Jr., are entitled to recover from Inman, their former client, pursuant to a written fee agreement.

Under the circumstances presented herein, we conclude that (1) the agreement is not a contingent fee arrangement; (2) the attorneys and Inman shared the same understanding of the agreement; and (3) the fee charged is reasonable. Consequently, we…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Campbell v. Florida Steel Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Win Myint and wife Patti KI. Myint v. Allstate Insurance CompanyTennessee Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Walter P. Maksym, Jr. v. Dolores LoeschCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
  4. Connors v. ConnorsTennessee Supreme Court · 1980
  5. White v. McBrideTennessee Supreme Court · 1996

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Commissioner of Transportation v. Medicine Bird Black Bear White EagleCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2001
  2. Fell v. RamboCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2000
  3. Hunter v. UraTennessee Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Ralston v. HobbsCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2009
  5. Starks v. BrowningCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1999

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API