Legal Opinion

Eugene S. Ballin & Co. v. M. Ferst & Co.

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided January 15, 1875PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The refusal of a motion to dissolve an injunction, granted on order to show cause, is not subject to review by this court, under sections 3212 et seq. of the Code, even though said motion may have been made by defendants who have had themselves made parties since said writ was ordered to issue. This principle applies as well to a motion to vacate the appointment of a receiver. (R.)

Injunction. Receiver. Before the Supreme Court. January Term, 1875.

The above head-note explains itself.

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hollinshead v. Town of LincolntonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1890
  2. Grizzel v. GrizzelSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  3. Smith v. WillisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
  4. James v. WilkersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1927
  5. Jones v. GrahamSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API