Legal Opinion

South Yuba River Citizens League v. National Marine Fisheries Service

District Court, E.D. California

Decided May 5, 2009No. CIV. S-06-2845 LKK/JFMPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

LAWRENCE K. KARLTON, Senior District Judge.

Plaintiff environmental groups bring various claims arising primarily out of the structure and operation of two dams on the South Yuba River. The Sixth Amended Complaint brings claims under the Administrative Procedures Act (“APA”) and the Endangered Species Act’s (“ESA”) citizen suit provision, alleging that the various defendants violated provisions of the ESA.

Plaintiffs’ fourth claim for relief alleges that the Army Corps of Engineers violated the ESA’s prohibition on “take” of protected species in its operation and licensing of the two dams.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Bennett v. SpearSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Safe Air for Everyone v. MeyerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  3. Joseph Osborn and Pamela Osborn, Individually and as Father and Mother and Guardians Ad Litem of Shawna Osborn v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
  4. Shelley Savage v. Glendale Union High School, District No. 205, Maricopa CountyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  5. Babbitt v. Sweet Home Chapter, Communities for Great Ore.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. California Trout, Inc. v. United States Bureau of ReclamationDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2015
  2. Strahan v. RougheadDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2012
  3. Natural Res. Def. Council v. ZinkeDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2018
  4. Northwest Environmental Defense Center v. U.S. Army Corps of EngineersDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API