Legal Opinion
California Trout, Inc. v. United States Bureau of Reclamation
District Court, C.D. California
Decided June 22, 2015No. Case No. CV 14-7744 FMO (PLAx)PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER Re: PENDING MOTIONS
Fernando M. Olguin, United States District Judge
Having reviewed and considered all the briefing filed with respect to Federal Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Complaint as Moot (“Motion to Dismiss”) and the Joint Applicants’ Motion to Intervene (“Motion to Intervene”) (collectively, “Motions”), the court concludes that oral argument is not necessary to resolve the Motions. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 78; Local Rule 7-15; Willis v. Pac. Mar. Ass’n, 244 F.3d 675, 684 n. 2 (9th Cir.2001).
INTRODUCTION
California Trout, Inc. (“California Trout” or “plaintiff’) filed a…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Lewis v. Continental Bank Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Lee v. City Of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Chafin v. ChafinSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Natural Res. Def. Council v. ZinkeDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2018
- Alliance for the Wild Rockies v. BurmanDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2020
- Alliance for the Wild Rockies v. U.S. Department of the InteriorDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2025
- Center for Biological Diversity v. RossDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019
- Dominique Nelson, individually and on behalf of similarly situated individuals v. Reddit, Inc., a Delaware corporationDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2026
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.