Legal Opinion

In Re Marriage of Ludwinski

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 17, 2002No. 4-01-0853PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Myerscough

Petitioner, David V Ludwinski, appeals the trial court’s amended order concerning permanent visitation. On appeal, petitioner argues that the trial court’s amended permanent visitation order is an abuse of discretion, violates the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Act (Custody Jurisdiction Act) (750 ILCS 35/1 though 26 (West 2000)), and exceeds the appellate court’s mandate. We affirm.

I. BACKGROUND

Because the parties and this court are familiar with the facts in the present case, we will discuss only those facts necessary to understand this court’s disposition. Petitioner and respondent, P.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. AbrahamAppellate Court of Illinois · 2001
  2. In re Marriage of PitullaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
  3. In Re Marriage of BlindermanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1996
  4. Kelly v. WarnerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
  5. In Re Marriage of DeemAppellate Court of Illinois · 2002

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. AbramSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2008
  2. Quincy School District No. 172 v. Illinois Educational Labor Relations BoardAppellate Court of Illinois · 2006
  3. Quincy School District v. Illinois Educational Labor Relations BoardAppellate Court of Illinois · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API