Legal Opinion

Rabin v. Fivzar Associates

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided July 10, 1992No. 90 Civ. 4869 (RWS)PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SWEET, District Judge.

Plaintiff Sheldon Rabin (“Rabin”) has moved for an order pursuant to § 476 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act of 1991, Pub.L. No. 102-242,105 Stat. 2236 (codified at § 27A of the ■ Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. § 78aa-l), reinstating his claims under § 10(b) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 (“§ 10(b)”) against the defendants in this action. 1 For the following reasons, the motion is granted.

BACKGROUND

Rabin, a resident of Great Neck, New York filed this suit on July 23, 1990, alleging claims under § 10(b) and…

2Cases cited51 opinions

  1. Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
  2. Griffith v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Chevron Oil Co. v. HusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Mistretta v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Kremer v. Chemical Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. In Re Integrated Resources Real Estate Ltd. Partnerships Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1993
  2. Ades v. Deloitte & ToucheDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1992
  3. Morin v. TrupinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1992
  4. In Re Boesky Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1995
  5. Hyundai Merchant Marine Co. Ltd. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1995

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API