Legal Opinion

State v. Joyner

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 6, 1984No. 833SC798PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HILL, Judge.

Defendant contends that the trial court erred in denying defendant’s motion for a directed verdict at the close of the State’s evidence. Defendant argues that since the rifle was found unloaded and missing a firing pin, the State failed to prove the rifle allegedly used in the commission of the robbery was a firearm. We hold that defendant’s evidence did not preclude the finding that defendant perpetrated a robbery with a firearm.

Defendant was convicted of armed robbery in violation of G.S. 14-87(a) which provides in pertinent part as follows:

Any person . . . who, having in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. LeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  2. State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  3. State v. BaileySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  4. State v. AlstonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  5. Carolina v. McCallCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. FrazierCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  2. State v. MartinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
  3. Lyons v. LeeDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2002
  4. State v. AllenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  5. State v. WilliamsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API