Legal Opinion

Charles v. Patch

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided October 15, 1885PublishedCited by 22 opinions

Error to Jackson Special Law and Equity Court, — Hon. R. E. Cowan, Judge. (1) The land described in the petition is identified by the evidence as a part of that described in the deed from Coffman and Gregory to Elizabeth Charles, and was during all the time well known in its vicinity by the descriptions applied to it in the deeds offered in evidence.

Read the full summary

Error to Jackson Special Law and Equity Court, — Hon. R. E. Cowan, Judge. (1) The land described in the petition is identified by the evidence as a part of that described in the deed from Coffman and Gregory to Elizabeth Charles, and was during all the time well known in its vicinity by the descriptions applied to it in the deeds offered in evidence. This being so, the land was sufficiently described in all of said deeds, and the plat referred to in them became a part of said deeds. Tethrow v. Anderson, 63 Mo. 96 ; Means v. deLabeigne, 50 M©. 343; Mercierv. By., 54Mo. 506. (2) Parol proof is…

1Opinion of the CourtRat, J.

This is a suit in ejectment to recover the possession of the real estate described in the petition as-follows : Part of a certain tract of land formerly known as land or lot five hundred, in the orginal survey of the-City of Kansas, commonly called Old Town, as the same is marked or designated on the recorded plat of said original .survey and described as follows : ‘ ‘ Commencing at the southwest corner of Fifth and Wyandotte streets in the City of Kansas: thence westwardly along the south side of Fifth street; fifty-five feet, thence southwardly at right angles with Fifth street, and…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Jackson ex dem. Van Vechten v. SillNew York Supreme Court · 1814
  2. Farrar v. Christy's AdministratorsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1857
  3. Miller v. HardinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1877
  4. Hart v. RectorSupreme Court of Missouri · 1842
  5. Karst v. St. Paul, Stillwater & Taylor's Falls RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1875

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Bowen v. SwanderIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Utter v. SidmanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1902
  3. Baker v. AtkinsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1953
  4. Eckhard v. St. Louis Transit Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1905
  5. Berry v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1894

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API