Legal Opinion
Taylor v. Lindsey
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided March 9, 1998No. 24771PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MOORE, Justice:
We granted petitioners a writ of certiorari to review the Court of Appeals’ decision in Taylor v. Lindsey, Op. No. 96-UP-411 (Ct.App. filed November 18, 1996). We reverse.
FACTS
Petitioner Linda Echols purchased two lots from petitioner Jimmy Lindsey in the Camelot Court subdivision. 1 A restrictive covenant states: “No residence to cost less than $10,000.00 shall be erected on said lots____” The respondents brought this action seeking an injunction against Echols preventing her from placing a mobile home on her lots and preventing Lindsey from allowing the placement of mobile…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Townes Associates, Ltd. v. City of GreenvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
- Hamilton v. CCM, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1980
- Palmetto Dunes Resort v. BrownCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1985
- Forest Land Co. v. BLACKSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1950
- Marriott Corp. v. Combined Properties Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of Virginia · 1990
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- South Carolina Department of Natural Resources v. Town of McClellanvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
- Hardy v. AikenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
- Santoro v. SCHULTHESSCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2009
- Seabrook Island Property Owners Ass'n v. Marshland Trust, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004
- Kinard v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2014
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.