Legal Opinion
Hardy v. Aiken
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided June 12, 2006No. 26130PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Acting Justice HAYES:
The special referee found the duration of the restrictive covenants on the parties’ property could not be extended by amendment and expired January 14, 2005. This case was certified for review pursuant to Rule 204(b), SCACR, and we now affirm.
FACTUAL/PROCEBURAL BACKGROUND
In 1971, J. Donald King, Sr. subdivided a tract of land adjacent to Highway 81 into ten separate parcels — referred to as Lots 1-8 and Tracts A and B. On September 13, 1979, restrictive covenants applying to Lots 1-7 and Tracts A and B were recorded. 1 On January 14, 1980, these restrictive covenants were…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Tupper v. Dorchester CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
- Felts v. Richland CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
- South Carolina Department of Natural Resources v. Town of McClellanvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
- Hamilton v. CCM, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1980
- Allen v. Sea Gate Ass'n, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- South Carolina Department of Transportation v. Horry CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
- Buffington v. T.O.E. EnterprisesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2009
- Plott v. Justin EnterprisesCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2007
- Rhett v. GrayCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2012
- Snow v. SmithCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2016
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.