Legal Opinion

Commissioner v. Uniacke

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided December 31, 1942No. 80Published

1Opinion of the Court

SWAN, Circuit Judge.

Pursuant to section 51(b) (2) of the Revenue Act of 1936, 49 Stat. 1670, 26 U.S. C.A. Int.Rev.Acts, page 844, Mary Lewis Hague and her husband filed a joint income tax return for the year 1936. The joint return was executed by the husband, and Mrs. Hague took no part in its preparation except to furnish information concerning her own income^and expenses. On March 14, 1940 the Commissioner gave notice by letter addressed to both Mr. and Mrs. Hague that he had determined a deficiency in “your income tax liability” in the sum of more than $200,000. The notice stated that the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Woolford Realty Co. v. RoseSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Taft v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. Helvering v. JanneySupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  4. Cole v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1935
  5. United States v. RosebushDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1942

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API