United States v. Rosebush
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
1Opinion of the Court
SCHWELLENBACH, District Judge.
This matter is before the court now on the amended complaint against the additional defendant. Judgment upon the original complaint against defendant, in the amount of $37,220.85, has been entered. The purpose of this phase of this action is to subject certain securities now owned and held by the additional defendant to execution under the previously entered judgment. The defendant and additional defendant are husband and wife. The judgment against the defendant is based upon a deficiency assessed against him for income taxes due for the calendar year 1928. The…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Taft v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Helvering v. JanneySupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1939
- MacKenzie v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940
- Cole v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1935
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Manbourne, Inc. v. ConradCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- National Refining Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1947
- United States v. ShahCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
- Investment & Securities Co. v. RobbinsDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 1943
- Lyons v. FreshmanMontana Supreme Court · 1951
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.