Legal Opinion

State v. Cassada

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 19, 1969No. 6928SC401PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

The defendant assigns as error the acceptance by the court of a plea of guilty to the felony of receiving stolen goods, knowing them to have been stolen, when he had not been indicted for such an offense and had not waived a bill of indictment.

“The crimes of larceny and of receiving stolen goods, knowing them to have been stolen, are separate and distinct offenses. . . .” State v. Brady, 237 N.C. 675, 75 S.E. 2d 791 (1953).

In McClure v. State, 267 N.C. 212, 148 S.E. 2d 15 (1966), Chief Justice Parker stated:

*631“G.S. 15-137 reads in relevant part: ‘No person shall be . . . put on trial before any…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. . MorganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  2. State v. NugentSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  3. State v. AlbartySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  4. State v. BradySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  5. McClure v. StateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. BurnetteCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
  2. State v. CraigCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API