Legal Opinion
Popich v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided February 2, 1970No. Nos. 3757, 3758PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BARNETTE, Judge.
This is an action arising out of a building contract. The contractor seeks recov*606ery of the balance alleged due from the owner under the terms of the contract. The owner seeks by way of reconvention against the contractor and by separate suit against the contractor’s surety, recovery of an amount alleged necessary to complete the building and to correct the deficiencies caused by improper workmanship.
On February 9, 1965, Joseph A. Popich, owner of a lot in Buras in Plaquemines Parish, contracted with H. Bennett Fox, a building contractor, to build a residence thereon for the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Hernandez v. HarsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1959
- Chauvin v. La HitteSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1956
- Loeb v. NeilsonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1961
- Harper v. Home Indemnity CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1962
- McNeill v. ElchingerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1957
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Young v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1982
- Am. Eagle, Inc. v. EMPLOYERS'LIABILITY ASSUR. CORP.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1980
- Admiral Paint Company v. GoltzmanLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1972
- Boydstun v. JohnsonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1981
- Katz v. JudiceLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1971
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.