Chauvin v. La Hitte
Supreme Court of Louisiana
1Opinion of the Court
HAMITER, Justice.
Leonard LaHitte, who conducts a business in the City of New Orleans under the name of L & L Auto Sales and is the defendant herein, prosecutes this appeal from a judgment that rescinded his sale to plaintiff, Ovide J. Chauvin, of a 1953 Studebaker automobile, condemned him to refund the paid purchase price of $2,850, and awarded plaintiff attorney’s fees in the additional sum of $400.
As is shown by his assigned written reasons the district judge found as a fact that the defendant, in making the sale to plaintiff, fraudulently represented the automobile as being “brand new”…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Rhodes v. CollierSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1949
- Brantley v. TugwellSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1953
- Griffin v. Bank of Abbeville & Trust CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1955
- Efner v. KetteringhamSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1950
- Winkler v. Ascension Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1935
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Loeblich v. GarnierLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1959
- Cecil John Ogea v. Loffland Brothers Co. v. Phillips Petroleum Co., Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- Nat Harrison Associates, Inc. v. Gulf States Utilities CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- Breaux v. SimonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1958
- Montz v. TheardLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2002
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.