Legal Opinion

Chauvin v. La Hitte

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided January 16, 1956No. 42172PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAMITER, Justice.

Leonard LaHitte, who conducts a business in the City of New Orleans under the name of L & L Auto Sales and is the defendant herein, prosecutes this appeal from a judgment that rescinded his sale to plaintiff, Ovide J. Chauvin, of a 1953 Studebaker automobile, condemned him to refund the paid purchase price of $2,850, and awarded plaintiff attorney’s fees in the additional sum of $400.

As is shown by his assigned written reasons the district judge found as a fact that the defendant, in making the sale to plaintiff, fraudulently represented the automobile as being “brand new”…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Rhodes v. CollierSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1949
  2. Brantley v. TugwellSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1953
  3. Griffin v. Bank of Abbeville & Trust CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1955
  4. Efner v. KetteringhamSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1950
  5. Winkler v. Ascension Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1935

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Loeblich v. GarnierLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1959
  2. Cecil John Ogea v. Loffland Brothers Co. v. Phillips Petroleum Co., Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
  3. Nat Harrison Associates, Inc. v. Gulf States Utilities CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
  4. Breaux v. SimonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1958
  5. Montz v. TheardLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2002

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API