Smith v. State
New York Supreme Court
Action to foreclose a mechanic’s lien upon funds of the State of New York applicable to the payment for the improvement of a public highway in the towns of Skaneateles and Spafford, being known as Highway Improvement No. 431.
1Opinion of the CourtSutherland, J.
The defendant J. Charles Dayton contracted with the State of Hew York through the State Engineer and Surveyor to do all the work and furnish the necessary materials for the improvement of the Skaneateles-Spafford Boad Ho. 431, in the towns of Skaneateles and Spafford, Onondaga county, pursuant to chapter 115 of the I,aws of 1898, as amended by chapter 468 of the Laws of 1906. The work has been completed; and it is conceded by the Attorney-General that there is $4,067.99 due the contractor, Dayton, for the performance of said contract and for extra work. Dayton claims that the amount due him…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- In Re the Appraisal Under the Transfer Tax Act of the Estate of HoopleNew York Court of Appeals · 1904
- Maneely v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
- Thomas v. StewartNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Thomas v. SahaganNew York Supreme Court · 1890
- Deane Steam Pump Co. v. ClarkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Anderson v. HayesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926