Maneely v. City of New York
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
.. Separate appeals- by the plaintiff, Francis J. Maneely, as admin- - istrator, etc., and by the défendants, the United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company and others, from portions of a judgment of the Supreme Court, entered in the office.of the clerk of the county of New York on .the 3d day of February, 1906, upon the decision of the court rendered after a trial at the New York Special Term. .
1Opinion of the CourtLaughlin, J.
This is an action to foreclose a mechanic’s .lien, filed against moneys due or to' grow due the defendants, the surety companies, which, for brevity, will be designated the fidelity and bonding companies respectively, on a contract between the Armstrong & > Bolton Company and the city of New York,, bearing date, .the 20th. day of April, 1899, for the construction of the high and low-pressure steam plant, dynamo and electric lighting plant and. .'kitchen in the new city prison at Centre, Franklin and Leonard streets, for tile gross sum of $93,325. The Armstrong &.Bolton Company abandoned the…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Bear Lake & River Water Works & Irrigation Co. v. GarlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Born v. . SchrenkeisenNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
- Morton v. . TuckerNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
- Knapp v. SwaneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
- Frear v. . SweetNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Wilson v. MoonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934
- MacDonald, Etc. v. Calumet Supply Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1939
- David Lupton's Sons Const. Co. v. Hugger Bros. Const.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1933
- Electric Transmission Co. v. Pennington Gap Bank, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1923
- Piper v. New York State RailwaysAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1918
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.