Legal Opinion

Sipe v. Holliday

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1878PublishedCited by 6 opinions

From the Clinton Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtNiblack, C. J.

This was a suit by David E. Holliday and John C. Meneely against Charles Sipe and Noah V. Catterlin, on an injunction bond.

The complaint may be briefly stated as follows:

That on the 5th day of November, 1872, and for some time previously thereto, the plaintiffs were engaged in boul*5dering and otherwise improving certain ditches on the sides of the streets adjoining and surrounding the public square in the town of Frankfort, under a contract with the Board of Commissioners of the county of Clinton; that at that time the earth was in good condition, and the weather very favorable, for the work…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Godfrey v. GodfreyIndiana Supreme Court · 1861
  2. Wolcott v. WigtonIndiana Supreme Court · 1855
  3. Carpenter v. VanscotenIndiana Supreme Court · 1863
  4. Macy v. AlleeIndiana Supreme Court · 1862
  5. Morse v. MorseIndiana Supreme Court · 1873

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Griffin v. WallaceIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
  2. Pelkey v. National Surety Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
  3. Merrifield v. WestonIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
  4. Revell v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  5. Terre Haute & Indianapolis Railroad v. Peoria & Pekin Union Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1899

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API