Sipe v. Holliday
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Clinton Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtNiblack, C. J.
This was a suit by David E. Holliday and John C. Meneely against Charles Sipe and Noah V. Catterlin, on an injunction bond.
The complaint may be briefly stated as follows:
That on the 5th day of November, 1872, and for some time previously thereto, the plaintiffs were engaged in boul*5dering and otherwise improving certain ditches on the sides of the streets adjoining and surrounding the public square in the town of Frankfort, under a contract with the Board of Commissioners of the county of Clinton; that at that time the earth was in good condition, and the weather very favorable, for the work…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Godfrey v. GodfreyIndiana Supreme Court · 1861
- Wolcott v. WigtonIndiana Supreme Court · 1855
- Carpenter v. VanscotenIndiana Supreme Court · 1863
- Macy v. AlleeIndiana Supreme Court · 1862
- Morse v. MorseIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
3Cited by6 opinions
- Griffin v. WallaceIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
- Pelkey v. National Surety Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
- Merrifield v. WestonIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
- Revell v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Terre Haute & Indianapolis Railroad v. Peoria & Pekin Union Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1899
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.