Legal Opinion

Terre Haute & Indianapolis Railroad v. Peoria & Pekin Union Railway Co.

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided October 19, 1899PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from the Appellate Court for the Second District;—heard in that court on writ of error to the Circuit Court of Peoria county; the Hon. T. M. Shaw, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Boggs

The circuit court of Peoria county entered a decree dissolving an injunction, granted at the instance of the appellant company, restraining thé appellee company from excluding the appellant company from the use of certain tracks, switches and terminal facilities at the city of Peoria. The appellant company, in compliance with an order granting an appeal from such decree to the Appellate Court for the Second District and continuing the injunction in force pending such appeal, together with the other appellants as sureties, executed a bond conditioned as follows:

“Now, if said Terre Haute and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ruegger v. Indianapolis & St. Louis RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Sipe v. HollidayIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  3. Terre Haute & Indianapolis Railroad v. Peoria & Pekin Union Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1897

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Floersheim v. Board of CommissionersNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Pelkey v. National Surety Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
  3. Matthews v. Trinity Universal InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1946
  4. Gallagher v. SchmidtAppellate Court of Illinois · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API