Legal Opinion

Vance v. . Vance

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 14, 1932PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtConnor, J.

In Parker v. Dickinson, 196 N. C., 242, 145 S. E., 231, it is said: “Until a judicial sale has been confirmed, the purchaser is a mere preferred proposer. Confirmation is an act of consent and approval which the court gives to tbe sale, and for all practical purposes, tbe court is the vendor in such cases, and within the limitations prescribed by law, may give or withhold its consent in its discretion. Harrell v. Blythe, 140 N. C., 415, 53 S. E., 232.”

In the instant case, the clerk bad no power to confirm the sale reported by the commissioner until the expiration of twenty days from the date…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Harrell v. Blythe.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  2. Upchurch v. . UpchurchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
  3. Parker v. . DickinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bladen County v. . SquiresSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API