Legal Opinion

Bladen County v. . Squires

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 21, 1941Published

1Opinion of the Court

Pee Cueiam.

Stevens occupied the position of a preferred bidder with no rights in the property in law or equity until his bid had been accepted and confirmed by the court, at least untiL after the time for upset bids had expired. A subsequent order of resale within the time permitted for upset bids is a rejection of the original bid and the bidder is not entitled to contest the validity of the judgment of confirmation. Vance v. Vance, 203 N. C., 667, 166 S. E., 901; Richmond County v. Simmons, 209 N. C., 250, 183 S. E., 282. The court had authority to reject the bid and to order a resale in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Richmond County v. . SimmonsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  2. Vance v. . VanceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API