Legal Opinion

Parker v. . Dickinson

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 31, 1928PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeogden, J.

Does confirmation of a sale or of an actual partition take effect upon the date of confirmation or at the date of the sale ?

Until, a judicial sale has been confirmed the purchaser is a mere preferred proposer. Confirmation is an act of consent and approval which the court gives to the sale, and, for all practical purposes the.court is the vendor.in such cases, and within the limitations prescribed by law, may give or withhold its consent in its discretion. Harrell v. Blythe, 140 N. C., 415, 53 S. E., 232. However, when the transaction is completed by confirmation, and thereupon title is…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Joyner v. Futrell.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  2. Farmer v. . DanielSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1880
  3. Harrell v. Blythe.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  4. Vass v. . ArringtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1883
  5. McArtan v. . McLauchlinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1883

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Holt v. MaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  2. Wood v. . FauthSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  3. Vance v. . VanceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  4. Wilkes-Barre v. Luzerne County Tax Claim Bureau, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Luzerne County1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API