Legal Opinion

State v. Pittman

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 10, 1993No. 91-1413-CRPublishedCited by 64 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSteinmetz, J.

There are five issues presented in this case. First, in a criminal prosecution under sec. 940.225(2)(d), Stats., "sexual intercourse with a person who the defendant knows is unconscious," whether an expert's opinion that a woman under hypothetical conditions similar to those presented in this case could not sleep through a complete act of sexual intercourse was properly excluded by the trial court under sec. 904.01 (relevant evidence) and sec. 907.02 (expert testimony), given the following circumstances:

1. The victim claimed that the defendant had sexual intercourse with her while she was…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. United States v. Buddy Joe BarnardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
  2. State v. PharrWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
  3. State v. PulizzanoWisconsin Supreme Court · 1990
  4. State v. HaseltineCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1984
  5. State v. SorensonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1988

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by64 opinions

  1. Beacon Bowl, Inc. v. Wisconsin Electric Power Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. WatsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1999
  3. State v. St. GeorgeWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
  4. State v. Dale R. NeumannWisconsin Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Johnson Ex Rel. Adler v. KokemoorWisconsin Supreme Court · 1996

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API