Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Crabtree
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
KNIGHT, Justice.
Suit to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been received by the plaintiff, as a proximate consequence of defendants’ negligence in selling to plaintiff’s wife some meat which was unfit for) human consumption, and which plaintiff ate, and as a result thereof was made “sick, sore and ill for a long period of time.”
The first and third counts of the complaint charged simple negligence in the sale of the meat, while the third count charged that the plaintiff’s said injuries were the proximate consequence of a wanton wrong on the part of the defendants in the sale…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Alexander v. Woodmen of WorldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
- Williams v. ShowsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
- Ray v. SummerlinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
3Cited by11 opinions
- Atchley v. WoodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951
- Ferguson v. CallahanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
- Snow v. BaldwinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. MeeksAlabama Court of Appeals · 1949
- Nelson v. Cutter Boat & Motor Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1954
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.