Legal Opinion

Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Crabtree

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 28, 1935No. 6 Div. 630PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KNIGHT, Justice.

Suit to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been received by the plaintiff, as a proximate consequence of defendants’ negligence in selling to plaintiff’s wife some meat which was unfit for) human consumption, and which plaintiff ate, and as a result thereof was made “sick, sore and ill for a long period of time.”

The first and third counts of the complaint charged simple negligence in the sale of the meat, while the third count charged that the plaintiff’s said injuries were the proximate consequence of a wanton wrong on the part of the defendants in the sale…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Alexander v. Woodmen of WorldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
  2. Williams v. ShowsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
  3. Ray v. SummerlinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Atchley v. WoodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951
  2. Ferguson v. CallahanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
  3. Snow v. BaldwinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  4. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. MeeksAlabama Court of Appeals · 1949
  5. Nelson v. Cutter Boat & Motor Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1954

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API