Legal Opinion

Ray v. Summerlin

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 22, 1924No. 7 Div. 470PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.

Suit on a promissory note by appellant against appellee. The litigated issue of fact was presented by the averments of the seventh plea which interposed the defense that defendant was, with knowledge of plaintiff, only a surety on the note 'sued upon, and that plaintiff, without the knowledge or consent of the defendant, had agreed, with the principal, for a valuable consideration, paid before the maturity of the note, for an extension of time of payment. Scott v. Scruggs, 95 Ala. 383, 11 South. 215; Mobile & M. Ry. Co. v. Brewer, 76 Ala. 135.

It is insisted the proof was insufficient for…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Atlantic Coast Line R. R. v. Dahlberg Brokerage Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1910
  2. Alexander v. Woodmen of WorldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
  3. Scott v. ScruggsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1891
  4. Mobile & Montgomery Railway Co. v. BrewerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1884
  5. Prestwood v. McGowanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1906

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Webb v. DicksonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1964
  2. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. CrabtreeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
  3. Sibley v. BowenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  4. Ison Finance Co. v. GlasgowSupreme Court of Alabama · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API