Legal Opinion

Birk v. Hodgkins

California Supreme Court

Decided March 18, 1911No. L.A. No. 2536PublishedCited by 1 opinion

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.

Action to quiet title to lots 1 and 2 of block V of the Mott tract in the city of Los Angeles. Lot 1 lies at the corner of First and Flower streets, and lot 2 adjoins it to the north. Each of the lots, as claimed by plaintiffs, has a frontage of sixty feet on Flower Street and a depth of one hundred and sixty-five feet. The court found that the plaintiffs Susie E. Birk and Rebecca Lee Dorsey, Jr., are the owners of all of lot 1 and the south 52.72 feet, front and rear, of lot 2, and that the defendant Elizabeth A. Hodgkins is the owner of “the south 45.7 feet of the north 376.19 feet of the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Vance v. ForeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
  2. Cowles v. . ReavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
  3. Bullard v. KempffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  4. M'nairy v. HightourTennessee Supreme Court · 1814
  5. Blackburn v. NelsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hunt v. BarkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API