Legal Opinion

Quinn v. Minneapolis Threshing Machine Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 15, 1907No. Nos. 15,176—(54)PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Action in the district court for Meeker county to determine adverse claims to real estate. The case was tried before Powers, J., who made findings of fact and as conclusion of law found that defendant was the owner of the land subject to plaintiff’s right of redemption. From the judgment entered in pursuance of the findings, plaintiff appealed.

1Opinion of the Court

START, O. J.

This action was commenced in the district court of the county of Meeker by Charlotte A. Quinn, as plaintiff, against the Minneapolis Threshing Machine Company, to determine adverse claims to real estate. After issue was joined, and before the trial of the action, the plaintiff died intestate, and the administrator of her estate, Owen Quinn, the present plaintiff, by order of the court made upon his motion, the defendant opposing, was substituted as plaintiff in this action in place of the original plaintiff and authorized to prosecute the action as such administrator. In his…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Minneapolis Stock-Yards & Packing Co. v. HalonenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
  2. Shea v. HynesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
  3. Dodge v. Minnesota Plastic Slate Roofing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1869
  4. Walkow v. KingsleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lind v. O. N. Johnson Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
  2. Wheeler v. McKeonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
  3. Lamoreaux v. HigginsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  4. Crane v. VeleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API