Legal Opinion

Washington v. Werholtz

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided November 26, 2008No. 99,086PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Leben, J.:

Marcus Washington challenges the constitutionality of a Kansas Department of Corrections regulation that prohibits inmates from possessing sexually explicit materials. After hearing evidence, the district court held that the regulation was constitutional under Turner v. Safley, 482 U.S. 78, 89, 96 L. Ed. 2d 64, 107 S. Ct. 2254 (1987), because it was reasonably related to legitimate interests of the penitentiary. Regulations of this sort elsewhere “have been routinely upheld as rationally related to legitimate penological goals.” Smith v. Dept. of Corrections, 219 Or. App. 192, 198,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Turner v. SafleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Thornburgh v. AbbottSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Jonathan D. Mauro v. Joseph M. Arpaio, Sheriff Maricopa County, a Political Subdivision of the State of ArizonaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  4. State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2006
  5. Jacklovich v. SimmonsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Davis v. SchnurrCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2020
  2. Davis v. SchnurrCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2020
  3. White v. ShipmanCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API