Legal Opinion

Rourke v. State

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 5, 2018No. 20170375PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McEvers, Justice.

*313 [¶ 1] J. Erin Rourke appeals from a district court's order denying his application for post-conviction relief. Rourke argues the court erred by denying his application for post-conviction relief because he received ineffective assistance of counsel. We affirm.

I

[¶ 2] The State charged J. Erin Rourke with gross sexual imposition and corruption or solicitation of minors. Following a trial held in May 2016, the jury returned a verdict of guilty as to the gross sexual imposition charge and a verdict of not guilty as to the corruption or solicitation of minors charge. Rourke…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Laib v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Chisholm v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Bahtiraj v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  5. State v. YinemanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Urrabazo v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2024
  2. Brewer v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  3. Dubois v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
  4. Koon v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2023
  5. Samaniego v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2024

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API