Rourke v. State
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
McEvers, Justice.
*313 [¶ 1] J. Erin Rourke appeals from a district court's order denying his application for post-conviction relief. Rourke argues the court erred by denying his application for post-conviction relief because he received ineffective assistance of counsel. We affirm.
I
[¶ 2] The State charged J. Erin Rourke with gross sexual imposition and corruption or solicitation of minors. Following a trial held in May 2016, the jury returned a verdict of guilty as to the gross sexual imposition charge and a verdict of not guilty as to the corruption or solicitation of minors charge. Rourke…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Laib v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- Chisholm v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
- Bahtiraj v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
- State v. YinemanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Urrabazo v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2024
- Brewer v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
- Dubois v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
- Koon v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2023
- Samaniego v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2024
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.