Legal Opinion
Honeywell International Inc. v. Hamilton Sundstrand Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided June 2, 2004No. Nos. 02-1005, 02-1082PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge DYK, in which Chief Judge MAYER and Circuit Judges MICHEL, LOURIE, CLEVENGER, RADER, SCHALL, BRYSON, GAJARSA, LINN, and PROST join. Opinion dissenting in part filed by Circuit Judge NEWMAN.
DYK, Circuit Judge.
Honeywell International Inc. and Honeywell Intellectual Properties, Inc. (collectively “Honeywell”), the assignees of the patents in suit, brought suit against Hamilton Sundstrand Corporation (“Sundstrand”) for infringement of claims 8,10,11,19 and 23 of United States Patent No. 4,380,893 (the “'893 patent”) and claim 4 of Patent No. 4,428,194…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Warner-Jenkinson Co. v. Hilton Davis Chemical Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Festo Corp. v. Shoketsu Kinzoku Kogyo Kabushiki Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Pfaff v. Wells Electronics, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company v. Chemque, Inc. (Formerly Known as Chemque Canada, Ltd.) and Thomas & Betts Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- I. T. S. Rubber Co. v. Essex Rubber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Funai Electric Co., Ltd. v. Daewoo Electronics Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- ResQNet. Com, Inc. v. Lansa, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- Dahl v. SWIFT DISTRIBUTIONS, INC.District Court, C.D. California · 2010
- Kothmann Enterprises, Inc. v. Trinity Industries, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2005
- Funai Electric Co., Ltd. v. Daewoo Electronics Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.