Legal Opinion

Kothmann Enterprises, Inc. v. Trinity Industries, Inc.

District Court, S.D. Texas

Decided September 30, 2005No. Civ.A. H-01-2668PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND OPINION

ROSENTHAL, District Judge.

This patent infringement suit involves roadside safety devices designed to absorb the forces generated when vehicles collide with guardrails and other objects along highways and roads to reduce injury and damage. Kothmann Enterprises, Inc. (“KEI”) alleges that two devices manufactured and sold by Trinity Industries, Inc. (“Trinity”)' — 'the Mobile Protection System (“MPS-350”) and the Attenuating Crash Cushion (“TRACC”) — infringe certain claims of United States Patent No. 6,022,-003 (the ’003 Patent) and United States Patent No. 6,505,820 (the…

2Cases cited100 opinions

Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995

95 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

Duramed Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Paddock Laboratories, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2010