Legal Opinion

King County v. City of Seattle

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 25, 1941No. 28090PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDriver, J.

King County sold to Edward Burkheimer and wife, in the manner provided by statute, nine lots in the city of Seattle, which the county had previously acquired for taxes. The county treasurer’s deed was delivered to the purchasers, who brought suit to quiet title, joining King County therein .as a party plaintiff. A trial to the court resulted in a decree in favor of the plaintiffs, from which defendant city of Seattle has appealed.

The city’s interest in the lots consists solely of an unpaid balance on local improvement assessments levied against them prior to the sale. It is conceded that a…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Hoscheid v. BartholetWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Ball v. ClothierWashington Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Wood v. . KnappNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
  4. Hansen v. MauberretSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1900
  5. Carpenter v. Okanogan CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1931

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Koch v. MacK International Motor Truck Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  2. Chrysler Corporation v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1960
  3. Brun v. Northern Life InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Sullivan v. FariaSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1973
  5. Johnson v. MillerAlaska Supreme Court · 1964

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API