Legal Opinion

Pennzoil-quaker State Co. & Subsidiaries v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided October 28, 2004No. 02-279 TPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*691OPINION

DAMICH, Chief Judge.

I. Introduction

Before the Court are Plaintiffs Motion for Partial Summary Judgment and the Cross-Motion of the United States for Summary Judgment (hereinafter “Def.’s X-Mot.”). In this action, Pennzoil-Quaker State Company and Subsidiaries (hereinafter “Plaintiff’) seeks a refund of $426,784 for the tax years 1994-97, due to taxes it paid to the United States Government (hereinafter “Defendant”) on income earned in the taxable years 1981-1995. Plaintiff asserts that it is entitled to relief under the Claim of Right Doctrine, which is set forth in 26 U.S.C. § 1341 (§…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. Duncan v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  5. New York State Conference of Blue Cross & Blue Shield Plans v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1995

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Alcoa, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
  2. Pennzoil-Quaker State Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
  3. Reynolds Metals Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2005
  4. Guzak v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
  5. Alcoa Inc v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API