Pennzoil-quaker State Co. & Subsidiaries v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
*691OPINION
DAMICH, Chief Judge.
I. Introduction
Before the Court are Plaintiffs Motion for Partial Summary Judgment and the Cross-Motion of the United States for Summary Judgment (hereinafter “Def.’s X-Mot.”). In this action, Pennzoil-Quaker State Company and Subsidiaries (hereinafter “Plaintiff’) seeks a refund of $426,784 for the tax years 1994-97, due to taxes it paid to the United States Government (hereinafter “Defendant”) on income earned in the taxable years 1981-1995. Plaintiff asserts that it is entitled to relief under the Claim of Right Doctrine, which is set forth in 26 U.S.C. § 1341 (§…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Duncan v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- New York State Conference of Blue Cross & Blue Shield Plans v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Alcoa, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
- Pennzoil-Quaker State Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- Reynolds Metals Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2005
- Guzak v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
- Alcoa Inc v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.