Legal Opinion
United States v. Samuel Ervin Mills
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided July 8, 1994No. 93-8093PublishedCited by 79 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PAUL KELLY, Circuit Judge.
Defendant-Appellant Samuel Ervin Mills (“Mills”) appeals from his conviction on the charge of possession of a firearm by a felon, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g). He alleges a number of errors by the district court, including that: his suppression motion was erroneously denied, the judge allowed a constructive amendment of the indictment, flawed jury instructions allowed the jury to convict without reaching unanimity on the date of his illegal possession of firearms, admission of a prior instance of firearms possession prejudiced him, and the evidence was…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Huddleston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- U.S. v. MergersonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Wallace HooksCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
- United States v. James Harrison HathawayCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by79 opinions
- United States v. WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. McKissickCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Brian L. Miller, United States of America v. Michael Ray HicksCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Gary Allen Lott, United States of America v. Johnny Marton Lott, AKA Johnny Martin LottCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Ricco Devon PrentissCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.