Legal Opinion
United States v. Ricco Devon Prentiss
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided July 12, 2001No. 98-2040PublishedCited by 107 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ON REHEARING EN BANC
2Per curiam
After a divided panel vacated the defendant’s conviction for committing arson in Indian country, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§81 and 1152, see United States v. Prentiss, 206 F.3d 960, 962 (10th Cir.2000), this court granted rehearing en banc on the following questions: (1) whether the Indian/non-Indian statuses of the victim and the defendant constitute elements of the crime, and, if so, (2) whether the failure of an indictment to allege these elements deprives the court of subject matter jurisdiction or instead is subject to harmless error review.
A majority of this court…
3Cases cited88 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by107 opinions
- Chester McCoy v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Dustin John HiggsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. StewartCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Ignasio Maldenaldo Sanchez, United States of America v. Santiago Gilberto SanchezCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2001
- State v. DunnSupreme Court of Kansas · 2016
102 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.