Legal Opinion

Tinsley v. Crespin

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 25, 1958No. 18599, 18601, 18597, 18602, 18600, 18598PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Moore

The same basic issues are involved in each of the above captioned actions. The trial court at a single hearing considered the questions presented, although no order was made consolidating the records which were maintained separately below and are lodged separately in this court. The reporter’s transcript of the hearing appears in cause No. 18599. On our own motion we have consolidated the above . entitled actions - for disposition by one opinion-in this court.

Defendants in error, to whom we will refer as petitioners, instituted proceedings in the trial court by petitions for writs in the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Olin Mathieson Chemical Corporation v. FrancisSupreme Court of Colorado · 1956
  2. Cooper Motors, Inc. v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1955
  3. Driverless Car Co. v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Colorado · 1932
  4. Bustamante v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1956
  5. Smalley v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1956

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Parrish v. LammSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
  2. Shone v. StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1968
  3. Specht v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1964
  4. People v. Sa'RaColorado Court of Appeals · 2004
  5. Pigg v. TinsleySupreme Court of Colorado · 1965

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API