State v. Curran
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
THAYER, J.
The defendant, Harold N. Curran, appeals his conviction for driving after suspension, RSA 263:64 (1993) (amended 1994), after a jury trial in the Portsmouth District Court (Lawrence, J.). The question presented on appeal is whether RSA 263:64, IV, which provides a misdemeanor sentence for individuals who drive after their licenses have been suspended or revoked for certain specified offenses, contains a mens rea requirement. We reverse and remand.
On April 1, 1993, the defendant was arrested for driving after suspension. The provision under which the defendant was…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In re WalkerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1994
- State v. GodingSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985
- State v. WalshSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. Rollins-ErcolinoSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
- State v. Arthur KardonskySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2016
- State v. WatkinsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2002
- State v. PolkSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2007
- State of New Hampshire v. Teresa MerconSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2021
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.