Legal Opinion

State v. Curran

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided December 22, 1995No. 93-577PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

THAYER, J.

The defendant, Harold N. Curran, appeals his conviction for driving after suspension, RSA 263:64 (1993) (amended 1994), after a jury trial in the Portsmouth District Court (Lawrence, J.). The question presented on appeal is whether RSA 263:64, IV, which provides a misdemeanor sentence for individuals who drive after their licenses have been suspended or revoked for certain specified offenses, contains a mens rea requirement. We reverse and remand.

On April 1, 1993, the defendant was arrested for driving after suspension. The provision under which the defendant was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re WalkerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1994
  2. State v. GodingSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985
  3. State v. WalshSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. Rollins-ErcolinoSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
  2. State v. Arthur KardonskySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2016
  3. State v. WatkinsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2002
  4. State v. PolkSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2007
  5. State of New Hampshire v. Teresa MerconSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2021

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API