Legal Opinion

State v. Watkins

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided December 24, 2002No. 2001-172PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNadeau, J.

The defendant, Bruce Watkins, was convicted in Superior Court (Hampsey, J.) for driving after having been certified a habitual offender, see RSA 262:23 (1993) (amended 2000, 2001), and disobeying a police officer, see RSA 265:4(I)(b) (1993). In his brief on appeal, he seeks reversal of only the driving after certification conviction. We reverse and remand.

The record supports the following facts. The defendant was stopped for a traffic violation on June 3, 2000. When it was discovered that he had given the officer who stopped him a false name, the defendant was arrested for disobeying a police…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. State v. LambertSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2001
  2. State v. BassettSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995
  3. State v. McGlewSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995
  4. State v. DushameSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1992
  5. State v. SmithSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1996

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. AyerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2006
  2. State v. LegereSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2008
  3. State v. StoweSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2011
  4. State v. BELONGASupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2012
  5. State v. BlomquistSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2006

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API