Legal Opinion
State v. Arthur Kardonsky
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided June 14, 2016No. 2015-0383PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBassett, J.
The defendant, Arthur Kardonsky, appeals the finding of the Circuit Court (Boyle, J.) that he was guilty of the violation-level offense of driving after suspension of his driver’s license. See RSA 263:64 (2014). On appeal, he argues that the trial court erred by ruling that this violation-level offense does not require the mens rea of “knowingly.” Because we agree, we reverse.
The relevant facts follow. The defendant was originally charged with both a misdemeanor and a violation-level offense for driving his motor vehicle after his privilege to do so had been suspended. The misdemeanor offense…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Diana Camire v. The Gunstock Area CommissionSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2014
- State of New Hampshire v. Jeffrey MaxfieldSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2015
- State v. MayoSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2015
- State v. CurranSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995
- State v. KOREAN METHODIST CHURCHSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2008
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. Jose Batista-SalvaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2019
- New Hampshire Housing Finance Authority v. Pinewood Estates Condominium AssociationSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2016
- Appeal of James G. Boyle, as Trustee of the 150 Greenleaf Avenue Realty TrustSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2016
- Dylan O'Malley-Joyce & a. v. Travelers Home and Marine Insurance CompanySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2022
- In re Guardianship of C.R.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2022
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.