Legal Opinion

Fulford v. Heath

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 24, 1948No. 5878PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PITTS, Chief Justice.

This suit is in the nature of trespass to try title but in reality it resolves itself into a boundary suit filed by appellee, E. D. Heath, against appellants, Walter C. Ful- ford and wife, Della M. Fulford, and Billy J. Fulford, to establish a common boundary line between lots 4 and 5, block 60, of Crest-lawn Addition to the City of Lubbock, Lubbock County. Appellants answered with a plea of not guilty and claimed title by limitation to a strip of land 5.7 feet wide and 131 feet long adjacent to both lots with a common boundary line separating them. The sole controversy…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Arambula v. SullivanTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Moore v. WootenTexas Commission of Appeals · 1926
  3. Houston Oil Co. of Texas v. JonesTexas Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Boston Ins. Co. v. RainwaterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1946
  5. Thompson v. MoorTexas Commission of Appeals · 1929

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Wall v. Carrell, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)1995
  2. Chittim v. AuldCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1949
  3. Moore v. Stone, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2008
  4. Disheroon v. CoxCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956
  5. Hughes v. TrimbleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1953

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API