Legal Opinion

Richard v. American Union Bank

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 25, 1924PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBijur, J.

This is a motion by the defendant to dismiss the complaint on the ground that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.

The complaint alleges that on November 14, 1919, the Nemeth State Bank (defendant’s predecessor) agreed, in consideration of the sum of $72,755, “ to sell the plaintiffs 2,000,000 lei, and to transmit the same by cable forthwith for the accounl of these plaintiffs ” to a bank in Roumania, “ the same to be payable for the account of the plaintiffs on November 17, 1919; that by said agreement it was provided that the Nemeth State Bank would establish a…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Hoppe v. . Russo-Asiatic BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
  2. Legniti v. Mechanics & Metals National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
  3. Thomson v. . Bank of British North AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  4. The Dry Dock Bank v. . the American Life Ins. and Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1850
  5. Wilde v. MahaneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1903

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Petkus v. BankasNew York Supreme Court · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API